The Numbers Inside

The Numbers Inside DNA

Four letters, 64 words, 20 building blocks: how life encodes information.

The question

How can four chemical letters describe every protein in your body?

The short answer

DNA uses four bases, read three at a time. That gives 64 possible “words”, which map onto 20 standard amino acids plus stop signals, with plenty of redundancy.

UUU UUC UUA UUG UCU UCC UCA UCG UAU UAC UAA UAG UGU UGC UGA UGG CUU CUC CUA CUG CCU CCC CCA CCG CAU CAC CAA CAG CGU CGC CGA CGG AUU AUC AUA AUG ACU ACC ACA ACG AAU AAC AAA AAG AGU AGC AGA AGG GUU GUC GUA GUG GCU GCC GCA GCG GAU GAC GAA GAG GGU GGC GGA GGG 4 × 4 × 4 = 64 codons · 61 code for amino acids · 3 stop (highlighted)
4 bases, read in threes, give 4 × 4 × 4 = 64 codons: 61 name amino acids and 3 mean stop.

What science knows

Established Science

DNA is written in four bases: adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G) and thymine (T). When a gene is copied into RNA, uracil (U) replaces thymine.

In 1961 Francis Crick, Sydney Brenner and colleagues showed the code is read in triplets, and Marshall Nirenberg and Heinrich Matthaei found the first word: UUU means phenylalanine.

The pattern

Established Science

Some of the numbers:

QuantityValue
Bases4
Possible codons (4³)64
Codons for amino acids61
Stop codons3 (UAA, UAG, UGA)
Standard amino acids20
Base pairs per helix turnAbout 10.5
Human genomeAbout 3.1 billion base pairs

What is still uncertain

Active Research

Why life uses this particular code is still debated. Francis Crick suggested it might be a “frozen accident”; other researchers argue it was shaped to limit the damage of copying errors.

Why humans find it interesting

Historical Fact

James Watson and Francis Crick published the double helix in 1953, relying on X-ray images made by Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling.

Why CUE finds this interesting

CUE Perspective

DNA is the most literal example of numbers carrying meaning: a small alphabet, read in fixed-size groups, produces the variety of life.

CUE works with a very different kind of code, the numbers of a birth date. These scientific relationships do not prove the CUE system, and CUE does not claim they do. But DNA is a reminder that simple symbols, combined by rules, can hold enormous information.

Explore next

Sources

  • Crick, Barnett, Brenner & Watts-Tobin, “General nature of the genetic code for proteins”, Nature 192 (1961)
  • Nirenberg & Matthaei, “The dependence of cell-free protein synthesis in E. coli upon naturally occurring or synthetic polyribonucleotides”, PNAS 47 (1961)
  • Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell, 6th ed. (Garland, 2014)
  • Crick, “The origin of the genetic code”, Journal of Molecular Biology 38 (1968)

Written by CUE from the sources above. Some topics were suggested by Polymath; its claims are not reproduced.